case law citation us - An Overview

Google Scholar – an enormous database of state and federal case regulation, which is searchable by keyword, phrase, or citations. Google Scholar also allows searchers to specify which level of court cases to search, from federal, to specific states.

Case legislation is specific towards the jurisdiction in which it was rendered. As an illustration, a ruling in the California appellate court would not generally be used in deciding a case in Oklahoma.

Additionally, it addresses the limitation period under Article ninety one and 120 on the Limitation Act, focusing on when plaintiff to seek cancellation. The importance of deciding application under Order VII Rule eleven CPC based solely on plaint averments in highlighted, excluding extrinsic material at this stage. Read more

The a lot of this power casts an obligation about the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for the crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. However it can be made apparent that police is free to acquire action against any person that is indulged in criminal activities issue to regulation. eight. The DIGP concerned is directed to prioritize this matter and, after hearing both parties within two months, address the alleged police misconduct. If the officials are found culpable, departmental proceedings for their punishment must be initiated, and they shall be assigned non-industry duties within the interim period. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads 113 Order Date: 08-APR-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp

13 . Const. P. 209/2025 (S.B.) Saifullah Jamali (Disable) V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi After arguing the matter at some length, both parties have agreed into the disposal of the instant petition around the premise that the DIGP Malir will hear the petitioner and also private respondents and will choose care of many of the facets of the case and be certain that no harassment shall be caused to both the parties.

a hundred forty five . Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Rehan Pervez V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the moment Petition under Article 199 of the Constitution based around the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued towards the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement inside the FIR lodged by FIA and while in the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.

In 1996, the Nevada Division of Child and Family Services (“DCFS”) removed a twelve-year previous boy from his home to protect him from the horrible physical and sexual abuse he experienced endured in his home, and to prevent him from abusing other children in the home. The boy was placed within an unexpected emergency foster home, and was later shifted around within the foster care system.

eleven . Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Primarily, this is a free and democratic place, and once a person becomes a major she or he can marry whosoever he/she likes; When the parents from the boy or Female never approve of these types of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the maximum they could do if they're able to Slash off social relations with the son or even the daughter, but they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes these kinds of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or girl that is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or man who is a major, the pair get more info is neither harassed by any person nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anybody who presents these threats or harasses or commits acts of violence either himself or at his instigation, is taken to process by instituting criminal proceedings because of the police against such persons and further stern action is taken against these kinds of person(s) as provided by regulation.

161 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming to your main case, It is usually a properly-recognized proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence from the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of the charge, however, that is subject towards the procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, with the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-enjoy the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings on the evidence.

Summaries deliver an essential glimpse into the intricate landscape of Environment and Climate Laws in Pakistan. Delving into this realm unveils a mosaic of regulations and policies aimed toward safeguarding natural resources, mitigating environmental degradation, and combating climate change.

In other circumstances as discussed supra pensionary benefits cannot be stopped on account of criminal charges after the retirement of two years; and, is violative of your law laid down via the Supreme Court during the case of Haji Muhammad Ismail Memon, PLD 2007 SC 35. As a result, the competent authority in the parent department with the petitioner and the Chief Secretary, Sindh, are liable to release the pensionary amount in the petitioner and fork out the pension amount and other ancillary benefits into the petitioner to which He's entitled under the regulation within two months from the date of receipt of this order. The competent authority on the respondent is usually directed to recalculate the pensionary benefits on the petitioner and increases accrued thereon the withheld pensionary benefits with effect from stopping to date. Read more

A year later, Frank and Adel have a similar challenge. When they sue their landlord, the court must use the previous court’s decision in applying the law. This example of case law refers to two cases read while in the state court, at the same level.

We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site, or even the information linked to about the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can create inaccuracies. You should read the full case before counting on it for legal research purposes.

Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming towards the main case, it is also a perfectly-proven proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence from the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty from the charge, however, that is topic to your procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, for that reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-take pleasure in the evidence and to reach at its independent findings on the evidence.